Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ15W
77 Imaging
42 Features
31 Overall
37
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- New Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB550
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ15W: A Detailed Comparison for Discerning Photographers
Choosing the right camera requires more than glossing over specs sheets. You want a dependable tool to unleash your creativity - whether capturing portraits, landscapes, or action-packed moments. Today, we’re diving deep into two fascinating cameras from different segments and times: the Olympus E-400, an entry-level DSLR from 2006 built on the Four Thirds system, and the Samsung HZ15W (also known as WB550), a compact superzoom bridge camera from 2009. At first glance, they look worlds apart. But how do they stack up when scrutinized through the lenses of real-world performance, technical muscle, and usability?
Let’s walk through a hands-on, comprehensive comparison, so you get not just numbers but meaningful insight to find the perfect match for your photographic journey.
Seeing the Size and Ergonomics: Handling First Impressions
Handling a camera shapes your experience. The Olympus E-400 enjoys a classic DSLR form factor, geared towards familiar ergonomics, while the Samsung HZ15W targets portability with a compact design optimized for travel and convenience.

-
Olympus E-400: Weighing about 435 grams with dimensions of 130 x 91 x 53 mm, it feels substantial without being bulky. The grip is modest, but because it’s a DSLR, it offers a comfortable hold suitable for longer shoots and lens swapping. A pentamirror optical viewfinder also aids stability by anchoring your eye to the camera.
-
Samsung HZ15W: At just 249 grams and 105 x 61 x 37 mm, this camera is nimble and pocketable. Its fixed lens and smaller body make it great for on-the-go shooting but can feel cramped for users with larger hands or for extended shooting sessions.
If you prioritize ergonomic comfort and the tactile confidence of a DSLR body, the Olympus leads. For portability and travel convenience, the Samsung shines.
Exploring Control and Design: Interface Insights
Both cameras demonstrate their design philosophies through control layouts. Being hands-on with physical buttons and dials makes a huge difference for usability.

-
Olympus E-400: It has classic DSLR controls including shutter priority and aperture priority modes, essential for creative exposure control. The modest top-screen is absent, but exposure modes and flash controls are logically placed. However, its 2.5-inch fixed LCD with low resolution limits image review sharpness.
-
Samsung HZ15W: Eschewing traditional DSLR controls, its design is compact with a 3-inch, higher resolution LCD. Touchscreen is absent, but menu navigation is quite accessible on the bigger screen. Exposure modes and manual controls are limited, focusing on ease for casual photography rather than manual tweaking.
If you desire creative manual control and familiar DSLR handling, the Olympus offers more depth. For beginners or quick captures with minimal fuss, Samsung’s interface is friendly and efficient.
Sensor Technology & Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Sensor size and capability dramatically affect image quality. The Olympus E-400 features a Four Thirds 10MP CCD sensor, while the Samsung HZ15W relies on a much smaller 12MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor inside a fixed-lens body.

Breaking Down the Specs
| Feature | Olympus E-400 (Four Thirds) | Samsung HZ15W (1/2.3" CCD) |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 17.3 x 13 mm | 6.08 x 4.56 mm |
| Sensor Area | 224.9 mm² | 27.72 mm² |
| Resolution | 10 MP (3648 x 2736) | 12 MP (4000 x 3000) |
| ISO Range | 100 - 1600 | 80 - 3200 |
| Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
| Native Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3, 3:2 |
Real-World Implications
-
Image Quality & Noise: The Olympus’s significantly larger sensor results in better noise control and image quality, especially noticeable in low-light or high-contrast scenarios. The Four Thirds sensor captures more light per pixel, rendering better dynamic range and color depth.
-
Fine Detail & Resolution: Even with 10MP, the E-400 delivers crisper images owing to larger photosites. The Samsung’s higher resolution is more a marketing figure than a pure quality indicator, as the small sensor tends to produce noisier images and less color fidelity under challenging conditions.
-
ISO Performance: The Samsung on paper offers higher ISO sensitivity (up to 3200), but real usability is often constrained by more aggressive noise and artifacts, limiting its use in dim environments.
If image quality and flexibility with higher ISO is your priority, Olympus’s sensor technology clearly outperforms the Samsung.
Viewing and Framing Your Shots: LCD and Viewfinders Compared
Effective framing tools can make or break your shooting experience.

-
Olympus E-400: Uses an optical pentamirror viewfinder covering approximately 95% of the frame but lacks an electronic viewfinder (EVF). The 2.5” LCD with 215k-dot resolution is quite basic, limiting composition aids during live view or playback. The absence of live view overall limits framing via LCD.
-
Samsung HZ15W: Relies solely on its 3” 460k-dot LCD without any optical or EVF option. Its live view feature allows you to compose shots on the LCD, making it intuitive for users moving away from traditional viewfinders. Anti-reflective coatings and decent brightness function well outdoors.
If you prefer shooting through a traditional viewfinder for stability and responsiveness, Olympus’s optical viewfinder is preferable. For casual users comfortable with LCD-framing, the Samsung’s bigger, sharper screen is advantageous.
Autofocus Systems and Speed: Catch the Moment
The autofocus system can define how well a camera performs in fast-paced environments.
| Feature | Olympus E-400 | Samsung HZ15W |
|---|---|---|
| AF Type | Phase Detection | Contrast Detection |
| Number of AF Points | 3 | Several (unspecified) |
| Autofocus Modes | Single, Continuous | Single |
| Face Detection | No | Yes |
| Tracking | No | No |
| Live View AF | No | Yes |
The Olympus’s phase detection autofocus is fundamentally faster and more accurate in good light but limited by only 3 AF points focused near the center, which reduces compositional flexibility.
Samsung’s contrast detection autofocus supported by face detection provides more intelligent focus in live view situations but is notably slower and less consistent on moving subjects.
For action, sports, or wildlife photography, the Olympus’s AF system, despite its simplicity, is preferable. In casual field shooting, Samsung’s face detection assists portraits better, especially for novices.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Capabilities
High frame rates matter when capturing fleeting moments.
-
Olympus E-400: Offers 3.0 fps burst shooting, shutter speeds ranging from 1/60s up to 1/4000s. It has some exposure modes including shutter and aperture priority but no manual exposure mode.
-
Samsung HZ15W: Burst rate details are not specified officially, and maximum shutter speed is 1/2000s. No manual exposure modes, and exposure compensation options are minimal.
The Olympus's faster shutter speed and burst capabilities favor action and sports shooters more than Samsung's casual design.
Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility
Lens compatibility is a major advantage when opting for mirrorless or DSLR-style systems.
-
Olympus E-400: Uses the Micro Four Thirds mount with access to a large after-market lens catalog (over 45 lenses at launch, growing exponentially). You can choose from primes, zooms, macro, and specialty optics - critical for creative and professional work.
-
Samsung HZ15W: Fixed 24-240mm equivalent zoom lens with 10x optical zoom. Small aperture range of f/3.3-5.8 limits low light and depth-of-field creative control.
If you want to evolve your camera system with professional or artistic lenses, Olympus is the clear winner.
Robustness, Weather Sealing, and Build Quality
- Neither camera offers weather sealing or ruggedized construction.
- Olympus’s DSLR body generally feels sturdier with better build materials.
- Samsung’s plastic-based compact design serves best in casual environments.
Battery Life and Storage
Both cameras accept common storage media but differ somewhat:
| Feature | Olympus E-400 | Samsung HZ15W |
|---|---|---|
| Storage Type | Compact Flash (Type I/II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/Multimedia cards |
| Battery Type | Proprietary Li-Ion (details unavailable) | Proprietary (details unavailable) |
| Battery Life | Data unavailable; expect moderate | Data unavailable; compact cameras tend to have limited life |
In practical shooting, the Olympus DSLR design is known to be more efficient and swappable with third-party options, whereas compact shooters sometimes sacrifice longevity for size.
Video and Multimedia Features
-
Olympus E-400: No video recording capability; purely for stills.
-
Samsung HZ15W: Records video at 1280 x 720 (HD) up to 30 fps, with Motion JPEG format. No microphone or headphone jacks; no manual video controls.
For creators interested in hybrid still/video, Samsung provides basic video functions, while the Olympus remains still-oriented.
Specialized Photography Disciplines
Portrait Photography
- Olympus: Larger sensor creates better skin tones and smoother bokeh with suitable lenses. No eye-detection autofocus, but you can manually focus with good precision.
- Samsung: Smaller sensor and fixed lens lead to less flattering bokeh. Offers face detection AF which is helpful for quick portraits.
Landscape Photography
- Olympus: Superior dynamic range and resolution for large prints, plus access to wide-angle lenses.
- Samsung: Limited shooting flexibility due to sensor size and fixed lens, lower dynamic range.
Wildlife / Sports Photography
- Olympus: Faster shutter and burst rates assist, but limited AF points require skill.
- Samsung: Slower AF limits tracking fast subjects; decent superzoom helps get closer visually but limited by image quality.
Street Photography
- Samsung: Smaller, discreet design is a plus.
- Olympus: Bulkier but better image quality and control.
Macro Photography
- Olympus: Supports dedicated macro lenses with high precision.
- Samsung: Macro mode to 5 cm but limited by fixed lens and sensor performance.
Night / Astrophotography
- Olympus: Superior low-light capability and control.
- Samsung: Limited ISO performance, higher noise.
Travel Photography
- Samsung: Ideal for its size and versatility with zoom.
- Olympus: More versatile but less compact and heavier.
Sample Images: Side-by-Side Comparison
To illustrate these differences visually, here are sample images showcasing each camera’s strengths, with attention to detail, color reproduction, and noise levels.
Notice the cleaner backgrounds and richer colors in Olympus images. Samsung performs well in bright daylight but struggles with shadows and fine details.
Overall Performance Ratings
Based on extensive testing covering image quality, autofocus, ergonomics, and value...
The Olympus tends to score higher on core photographic competencies, while Samsung ranks for casual convenience and zoom range.
Genre-Specific Performance Analysis
Breaking down suitability by photography types:
This highlights Olympus’s advantage in demanding and creative fields while Samsung suits point-and-shoot enthusiasts and travelers.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
The Olympus E-400 remains a compelling entry-level DSLR for beginners ready to dive deeper. It offers:
- Better image quality with a larger sensor
- More manual control and lens flexibility
- Faster, more reliable autofocus system
- Suitable for portraits, landscapes, macro, and moderate sports photography
If you seek creative growth and professional results, Olympus is your ally.
Meanwhile, the Samsung HZ15W (WB550) caters to casual photographers who want:
- A lightweight, pocketable camera with superzoom versatility
- Easy automatic modes with solid video capabilities
- Face detection autofocus for effortless portraits
- Ideal for travel, street, and quick snaps with minimal technical fuss
If portability and convenience top your requirements, Samsung’s compact reigns.
In Summary: Which Camera Should You Pick?
| User Profile | Best Option | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Beginner wanting creative growth | Olympus E-400 | DSLR body, manual modes, lens options |
| Traveler needing compact zoom | Samsung HZ15W | Lightweight, 10x zoom, video |
| Portrait and product photography | Olympus E-400 | Better image quality and bokeh |
| Casual snapshots and video clips | Samsung HZ15W | Simple operation, HD video |
| Wildlife/Sports (occasional) | Olympus E-400 | Better AF system and burst rate |
Next Steps: Explore and Experiment
Whichever path you follow, make sure to try these cameras hands-on. Check out compatible lenses for the Olympus or practice framing with the Samsung’s LCD. Your choice should feel as good physically as it performs technically. This is about expanding your creative vision with the right tool.
For beginners stepping into DSLR photography, the Olympus E-400 is a gateway to serious work without overwhelming complexity. Casual photographers looking for ease and zoom reach will find the Samsung HZ15W an appealing companion.
Ready to take the leap? Consider your priorities, start with a test shoot, and find the right accessories like extra batteries or memory cards to complement your new gear. With these insights, you’re well equipped to make an informed decision tailored to your photographic ambitions.
Happy shooting!
This article draws on extensive hands-on testing, technical analysis, and ergonomic assessment to deliver trustworthy, practical advice by photography experts.
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Samsung HZ15W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Samsung HZ15W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB550 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 249 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $599 | $330 |