Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ25W
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
70 Imaging
34 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Renewed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched July 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5000
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-400 versus Samsung HZ25W, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and HZ25W (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-400 was launched 4 years prior to the HZ25W and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-400 matches up against the HZ25W for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 and Samsung HZ25W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Samsung HZ25W
| E-400 | HZ25W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus E-400
| HZ25W | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | September 2006 | More recent by 46 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Samsung HZ25W
| E-400 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 features external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-400 versus Samsung HZ25W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-400 compared to the HZ25W.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and HZ25W is 77 and 70 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and HZ25W.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-400 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung HZ25W will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also called as | - | WB5000 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 215k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 428 grams (0.94 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $599 | $350 |