Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced February 2012
- Superseded the Samsung NX100
- Renewed by Samsung NX210
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus E-400 and Samsung NX200, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and NX200 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-400 was introduced 6 years before the NX200 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-400 grades against the NX200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Samsung NX200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Samsung NX200
| E-400 | NX200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Olympus E-400
| NX200 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 | September 2006 | More modern by 66 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 215k | Clearer screen (+399k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Samsung NX200
| E-400 | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 provides outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX200 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-400 and Samsung NX200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-400 versus the NX200.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and NX200 is 77 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The picture here should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and NX200.
All in all, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Samsung NX200 will give extra detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Samsung NX200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Samsung NX200 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2012-02-28 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 223 gr (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 69 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 618 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $599 | $818 |