Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Samsung NX200 front
Portability
90
Imaging
61
Features
57
Overall
59

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2006
  • Later Model is Olympus E-410
Samsung NX200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
  • Announced February 2012
  • Superseded the Samsung NX100
  • Renewed by Samsung NX210
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Overview

In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus E-400 and Samsung NX200, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and NX200 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-400 was introduced 6 years before the NX200 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-400 grades against the NX200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Samsung NX200

 E-400 NX200 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Olympus E-400

 NX200 E-400 
AnnouncedFebruary 2012September 2006More modern by 66 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution614k215kClearer screen (+399k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Samsung NX200

 E-400 NX200 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 provides outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX200 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-400 and Samsung NX200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-400 versus the NX200.

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and NX200 is 77 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The picture here should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and NX200.

All in all, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Samsung NX200 will give extra detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-400
Portrait photography with Samsung NX200
45
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
does not have liveview
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
76
has manual focus
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
offers face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography information
Samsung NX200 Street photography information
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
73
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than average in class (223g)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography info
Samsung NX200 Sports photography info
38
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
does not have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
55
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-400
Travel photography with Samsung NX200
49
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
68
lighter than average in class (223 grams)
MP count decent (20MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography info
Samsung NX200 Landscape photography info
44
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inch)
does not have liveview
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
70
has manual focus
change lenses (Samsung NX mount)
nice screen size (3")
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging information
Samsung NX200 Vlogging information
9
no video recording
34
offers face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (223 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
doesn't have external mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Samsung NX200
 Olympus E-400Samsung NX200
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-400 Samsung NX200
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2006-09-14 2012-02-28
Body design Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 15
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Samsung NX
Amount of lenses 45 32
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 7.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lb) 223 gr (0.49 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 69
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 618
Other
Battery life - 330 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BC1030
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $599 $818