Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX2000

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Samsung NX2000 front
Portability
89
Imaging
62
Features
68
Overall
64

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • Successor is Olympus E-410
Samsung NX2000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
  • Announced November 2013
  • Old Model is Samsung NX1100
  • Successor is Samsung NX3000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX2000 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-400 and Samsung NX2000, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and NX2000 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-400 was introduced 8 years prior to the NX2000 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-400 scores versus the NX2000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Samsung NX2000

 E-400 NX2000 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Olympus E-400

 NX2000 E-400 
AnnouncedNovember 2013September 2006More modern by 87 months
Screen size3.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution1152k215kClearer screen (+937k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Samsung NX2000

 E-400 NX2000 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Samsung NX2000 has sizing of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-400 and Samsung NX2000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-400 vs the NX2000.

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX2000 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and NX2000 is 77 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX2000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading through technical specs. The image below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and NX2000.

As you have seen, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Samsung NX2000 will resolve more detail using its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX2000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography details
Samsung NX2000 Portrait photography details
45
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no liveview feature
no manual exposure
resolution not great (10MP)
77
manual focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
provides face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Street photography camera
Samsung NX2000 as a Street photography camera
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
77
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
includes touch focus
lighter than competition in class (228g)
great high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography highlights
Samsung NX2000 Sports photography highlights
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
61
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
provides tracking focus
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography factors
Samsung NX2000 Travel photography factors
49
flash built-in
no Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
72
lighter than competition in class (228 grams)
includes touch focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Samsung NX2000
44
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
no Time Lapse recording
72
manual focus
swap lenses (Samsung NX mount)
lovely big screen (3.7")
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung NX2000 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
35
has touchscreen
provides face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (228 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
lack of mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Samsung NX2000
 Olympus E-400Samsung NX2000
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-400 Samsung NX2000
Type Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2006-09-14 2013-11-30
Physical type Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 21
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Samsung NX
Total lenses 45 32
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3.7 inches
Screen resolution 215k dots 1,152k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 8.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lb) 228 gr (0.50 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 75
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 908
Other
Battery life - 340 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BP1130
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $599 $599