Olympus E-400 vs Samsung ST100
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
Photography Glossary Olympus E-400 vs Samsung ST100 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-400 versus Samsung ST100, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and ST100 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and ST100 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-400 was introduced 4 years earlier than the ST100 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-400 grades vs the ST100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-400 vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 & Samsung ST100. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Samsung ST100
| E-400 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Olympus E-400
| ST100 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 | September 2006 | Fresher by 40 months | |
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") | |
| Display resolution | 1152k | 215k | Crisper display (+937k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Samsung ST100
| E-400 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 enjoys external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Samsung ST100 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-400 versus Samsung ST100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-400 compared to the ST100.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and ST100 is 77 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The visual below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and ST100.
All in all, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Samsung ST100 will offer extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images far more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Samsung ST100 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 215 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $599 | $250 |