Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched July 2010
- Previous Model is Sony A380
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-400 versus Sony A390, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and A390 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-400 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the A390 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-400 matches up vs the A390 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony A390
E-400 | A390 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-400
A390 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2010 | September 2006 | Newer by 47 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony A390
E-400 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony A390 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 versus Sony A390 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-400 compared to the A390.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and A390 is 77 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The picture below should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and A390.
Plainly, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A390 will resolve more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 45 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | None |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 549 grams (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $599 | $500 |