Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
54
Overall
54

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Sony A390
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Launched July 2010
  • Previous Model is Sony A380
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Overview

In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-400 versus Sony A390, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and A390 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-400 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the A390 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).

Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-400 matches up vs the A390 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony A390

 E-400 A390 

Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-400

 A390 E-400 
LaunchedJuly 2010September 2006Newer by 47 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kSharper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony A390

 E-400 A390 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony A390 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-400 versus Sony A390 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-400 compared to the A390.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and A390 is 77 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The picture below should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and A390.

Plainly, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A390 will resolve more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A390 as a Portrait photography camera
45
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
72
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
provides face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography details
Sony A390 Street photography details
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
76
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography features
Sony A390 Sports photography features
38
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
terrible battery power (230 shots)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography advice
Sony A390 Travel photography advice
49
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
53
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse function
terrible battery power (230 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Sony A390
44
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.5 inch)
no liveview
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
does not have Time Lapse function
61
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
terrible battery power (230 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A390 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
9
can't shoot video
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A390 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony A390
 Olympus E-400Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-400 Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
Class Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2006-09-14 2010-07-28
Body design Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4592 x 3056
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Number of lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Max video resolution None None
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lbs) 549 grams (1.21 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 66
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 607
Other
Battery life - 230 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $599 $500