Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A900

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front
Portability
54
Imaging
66
Features
62
Overall
64

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A900 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • Successor is Olympus E-410
Sony A900
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
  • Introduced October 2008
  • Newer Model is Sony A99
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A900 Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-400 and Sony A900, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and A900 (25MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and A900 (Full frame) provide different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-400 was announced 3 years before the A900 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-400 matches up versus the A900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony A900

 E-400 A900 

Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus E-400

 A900 E-400 
IntroducedOctober 2008September 2006Fresher by 25 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k215kClearer display (+707k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony A900

 E-400 A900 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 comes with physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony A900 has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).

See the Olympus E-400 and Sony A900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-400 compared to the A900.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A900 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and A900 is 77 and 54 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The graphic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and A900.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A900 will resolve more detail with its extra 15MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography factors
Sony A900 Portrait photography factors
45
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
manual exposure not available
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
71
you can focus manually
megapixel count excellent (25MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
no liveview
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography features
Sony A900 Street photography features
60
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
screen is fixed
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-400
Sports photography with Sony A900
38
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
70
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count excellent (25MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-400
Travel photography with Sony A900
49
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
54
weather proofing
megapixel count excellent (25 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Sony A900
44
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
lack of Timelapse recording
72
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count excellent (25 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
2 card slots
no liveview
does not have Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A900 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
9
can't shoot video
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony A900
 Olympus E-400Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-400 Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Category Entry-Level DSLR Advanced DSLR
Launched 2006-09-14 2008-10-22
Physical type Compact SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 25 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 6048 x 4032
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 215k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - TFT Xtra Fine color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.74x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/8000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Maximum video resolution None None
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 gr (0.96 pounds) 895 gr (1.97 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 79
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 1431
Other
Battery life - 880 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots One 2
Pricing at release $599 $2,736