Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-5R

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-5R front
Portability
89
Imaging
57
Features
76
Overall
64

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2006
  • Updated by Olympus E-410
Sony NEX-5R
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
  • Announced August 2012
  • Old Model is Sony NEX-5N
  • Updated by Sony NEX-5T
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-5R Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-400 versus Sony NEX-5R, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and NEX-5R (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and NEX-5R (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-400 was launched 7 years before the NEX-5R which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony NEX-5R being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the E-400 scores vs the NEX-5R in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony NEX-5R

 E-400 NEX-5R 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Olympus E-400

 NEX-5R E-400 
AnnouncedAugust 2012September 2006More modern by 72 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k215kSharper display (+705k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony NEX-5R

 E-400 NEX-5R 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 provides exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony NEX-5R has dimensions of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-400 versus Sony NEX-5R in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-400 versus the NEX-5R.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-5R size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and NEX-5R is 77 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-5R top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through specifications. The image here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and NEX-5R.

Plainly, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sony NEX-5R will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-5R sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography factors
Sony NEX-5R Portrait photography factors
46
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution low (10MP)
74
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography advice
Sony NEX-5R Street photography advice
60
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
80
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
supports touch to focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography information
Sony NEX-5R Sports photography information
38
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
68
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has tracking focus
supports phase detect auto focus
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography advice
Sony NEX-5R Travel photography advice
49
flash built-in
no Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
73
supports touch to focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography factors
Sony NEX-5R Landscape photography factors
45
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
no Timelapse recording
75
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
does not have image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging highlights
Sony NEX-5R Vlogging highlights
9
can't shoot video
31
touchscreen
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
missing microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony NEX-5R
 Olympus E-400Sony Alpha NEX-5R
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-400 Sony Alpha NEX-5R
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2006-09-14 2012-08-29
Physical type Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4912 x 3264
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 99
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 215k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lb) 276 grams (0.61 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 78
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.1
DXO Low light rating not tested 910
Other
Battery life - 330 shots
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images))
Time lapse recording With downloadable app
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $599 $750