Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-F3

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
57
Features
60
Overall
58

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2006
  • New Model is Olympus E-410
Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
  • Announced August 2012
  • Succeeded the Sony NEX-C3
  • Refreshed by Sony NEX-3N
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview

In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-F3, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and NEX-F3 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The E-400 was brought out 7 years prior to the NEX-F3 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-400 matches up against the NEX-F3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony NEX-F3

 E-400 NEX-F3 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus E-400

 NEX-F3 E-400 
AnnouncedAugust 2012September 2006More modern by 72 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k215kClearer screen (+705k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony NEX-F3

 E-400 NEX-F3 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 enjoys exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-F3 has proportions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-F3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-400 vs the NEX-F3.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and NEX-F3 is 77 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reading technical specs. The picture underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and NEX-F3.

As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-400 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony NEX-F3 will offer you greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography info
Sony NEX-F3 Portrait photography info
45
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview
no manual control
low MP (10 megapixels)
74
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-400
Street photography with Sony NEX-F3
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
76
has a tilting screen
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
does not have image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Sports photography camera
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
53
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
great battery (470 shots)
slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography highlights
Sony NEX-F3 Travel photography highlights
49
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
low MP (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
69
great battery (470 shots)
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography details
Sony NEX-F3 Landscape photography details
44
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no liveview
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
lack of Timelapse recording
70
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
great battery (470 shots)
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-400
Vlogging with Sony NEX-F3
9
can't shoot video
27
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
lack of external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-400 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony NEX-F3
 Olympus E-400Sony Alpha NEX-F3
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-400 Sony Alpha NEX-F3
Type Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2006-09-14 2012-08-16
Body design Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4912 x 3264
Highest native ISO 1600 16000
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Amount of lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 215k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435g (0.96 lbs) 314g (0.69 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.3
DXO Low light score not tested 1114
Other
Battery life - 470 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $599 $470