Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony QX1

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Olympus E-400 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2006
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-410
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-400 vs Sony QX1 Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-400 and Sony QX1, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and QX1 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-400 was launched 9 years before the QX1 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the E-400 matches up versus the QX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony QX1

 E-400 QX1 
Display size2.5""Larger display (+2.5")
Display resolution215k0kCrisper display (+215k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus E-400

 QX1 E-400 
AnnouncedSeptember 2014September 2006More modern by 97 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony QX1

 E-400 QX1 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-400 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 offers outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has specifications of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

See the Olympus E-400 and Sony QX1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-400 compared to the QX1.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and QX1 is 77 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing technical specs. The image below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and QX1.

As you can tell, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-400 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony QX1 will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Portrait photography camera
46
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no liveview
manual mode not available
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
66
you can focus manually
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
no manual exposure
no external flash support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography factors
Sony QX1 Street photography factors
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
69
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
features touch to focus
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competition (216g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography details
Sony QX1 Sports photography details
38
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
56
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
good battery power (440 CIPA)
max frames per second low (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography information
Sony QX1 Travel photography information
49
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not feature selfie friendly display
71
good battery power (440 per charge)
features touch to focus
good resolution (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (216g)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography factors
Sony QX1 Landscape photography factors
45
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
no liveview
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse mode
64
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
good battery power (440 per charge)
screen is small ( inches)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
missing Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging details
Sony QX1 Vlogging details
9
no video shooting
32
touchscreen enabled
supports face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
missing external microphone port
more heavy than competition (216 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-400 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony QX1
 Olympus E-400Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-400 Sony Alpha QX1
Type Entry-Level DSLR Lens-style
Revealed 2006-09-14 2014-09-03
Body design Compact SLR Lens-style
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 1600 16000
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.6
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5" -
Display resolution 215 thousand dot 0 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lb) 216 gr (0.48 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 440 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots One One
Retail price $599 $500