Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-400 and Sony H200, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and H200 (20MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and H200 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-400 was released 7 years earlier than the H200 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-400 scores vs the H200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony H200
E-400 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus E-400
H200 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | September 2006 | Fresher by 76 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Sharper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony H200
E-400 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony H200 has sizing of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-400 and Sony H200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-400 versus the H200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and H200 is 77 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and H200.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Sony H200 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 2920 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 20cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 pounds) | 530g (1.17 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
Style of battery | - | AA |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $599 | $250 |