Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front
Portability
67
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38

Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • Successor is Olympus E-410
Sony H200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
  • Announced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-400 and Sony H200, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and H200 (20MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and H200 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-400 was released 7 years earlier than the H200 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-400 scores vs the H200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony H200

 E-400 H200 
Manually focus More exact focusing

Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus E-400

 H200 E-400 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013September 2006Fresher by 76 months
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kSharper screen (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony H200

 E-400 H200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony H200 has sizing of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-400 and Sony H200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-400 versus the H200.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and H200 is 77 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and H200.

As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Sony H200 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography advice
Sony H200 Portrait photography advice
46
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview feature
no manual mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
37
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
includes face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Street photography camera
Sony H200 as a Street photography camera
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
45
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than others in class (530 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Sony H200 as a Sports photography camera
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
47
long zoom range (24-633mm 26.4 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
includes tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (240 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography information
Sony H200 Travel photography information
49
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
53
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (633mm)
does not have Timelapse function
bad battery life (240 CIPA)
more heavy than others in class (530g)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Sony H200
45
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.5")
no liveview feature
no manual mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
40
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
bad battery life (240 shots)
does not have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging features
Sony H200 Vlogging features
9
no video shooting
25
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focus
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone support
more heavy than others in class (530g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Sony H200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony H200
 Olympus E-400Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-400 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2006-09-14 2013-01-08
Physical type Compact SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 5184 x 2920
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-633mm (26.4x)
Max aperture - f/3.1-5.9
Macro focusing range - 20cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - ClearPhoto LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 6.80 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435g (0.96 pounds) 530g (1.17 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 pictures
Style of battery - AA
Battery ID - 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $599 $250