Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8d31/e8d315a1c42fc97ab7f34fb3dfd3dd8ecf9d8ac5" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 front"
69 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-465mm (F2.7-4.5) lens
- 547g - 116 x 81 x 86mm
- Revealed January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the H50 (9MP) is fairly close but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and H50 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-400 was released 3 years earlier than the H50 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony H50 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-400 scores versus the H50 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Sony H50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony H50
E-400 | H50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony H50 over the Olympus E-400
H50 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2009 | ![]() | September 2006 | Newer by 28 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony H50
E-400 | H50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 features external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony H50 has specifications of 116mm x 81mm x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") having a weight of 547 grams (1.21 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-400 vs the H50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3987/b39877c55e7250acddea80e33d161c69de3653e2" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and H50 is 77 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de67f/de67f338a42c4de00a3d1227607acd1c7601ff69" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and H50.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-400 will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3556/e355682272987e297b13fd28513cc26f61d0caae" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3f13/b3f131d1f68005ce6f744e707d3e8ed43696efa3" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H50 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 31-465mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.7-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 9.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480, 30 fps, 320 x 240, 8 fps |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lbs) | 547g (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 116 x 81 x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $599 | $80 |