Olympus E-400 vs Sony H55
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
92 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H55 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-400 vs Sony H55, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and H55 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and H55 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-400 was revealed 4 years prior to the H55 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony H55 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-400 scores against the H55 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H55 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Sony H55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony H55
E-400 | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony H55 over the Olympus E-400
H55 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2010 | September 2006 | More recent by 45 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony H55
E-400 | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H55 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 has outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony H55 has measurements of 103mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-400 vs Sony H55 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-400 versus the H55.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and H55 is 77 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H55 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The graphic here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and H55.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-400 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony H55 will render greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Sony H55 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lbs) | 200 gr (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $599 | $235 |