Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX1
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed April 2009
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX1 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-400 versus Sony HX1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the HX1 (9MP) is fairly comparable but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and HX1 (1/2.4") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-400 was announced 3 years prior to the HX1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-400 matches up against the HX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony HX1
E-400 | HX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Olympus E-400
HX1 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2009 | September 2006 | More modern by 31 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony HX1
E-400 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 offers exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony HX1 has dimensions of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-400 versus Sony HX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 against the HX1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and HX1 is 77 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The picture underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and HX1.
All in all, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-400 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-400 will provide more detail with its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2009-04-22 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 9.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1440x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 544 gr (1.20 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $599 | $47,999 |