Olympus E-400 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1: A Deep Dive into Two Distinct Imaging Worlds

In my 15 years of hands-on camera testing, few comparisons have felt as intriguing as placing the Olympus E-400 and Sony HX1 side-by-side. At first glance, they might seem apples and oranges - an entry-level DSLR versus a compact superzoom bridge camera - but exploring their real-world capabilities reveals valuable insights for enthusiasts deciding where to invest their trust and hard-earned cash. Both launched over a decade ago, they tell very different stories about design philosophy, technology, and use case focus. Today, I’ll share an honest, thorough evaluation based on my personal testing, as well as practical recommendations tailored to varied photography ambitions.

Holding and Feeling: Ergonomics That Shape Experience

Right out of the box, the Olympus E-400 stands apart as a compact SLR with a notably lightweight body at 435 grams. Its diminutive footprint (130x91x53 mm) means it disappears in your hands or camera bag, ideal for those who prioritize portability without surrendering DSLR fundamentals. The E-400’s body, built around the Four Thirds system, feels solid though unsurprisingly plastic-heavy given its entry-level status.

In contrast, the Sony HX1’s bridge-style body (115x83x92 mm) is chunkier and considerably heavier at 544 grams. While not particularly small, it strikes a comfortable balance - evoking an SLR look and feel but with a zoom lens permanently attached. The rubberized grip and button placement lend confidence for extended handheld use but it’s less discreet for street or travel shots.

Functionally, the Olympus’s control layout is straightforward; dedicated dials for shutter and aperture priority modes feel inviting for beginners eager to learn manual exposure. The minimalistic button array keeps distractions to a minimum but at a cost - missing features like an articulated screen or illuminated buttons will limit some shooting environments.

Sony’s HX1 ups the ante with a larger 3-inch tilting LCD, an electronic viewfinder that, while modest in resolution, helps composition in bright sunlight, and richer exposure customization. The HX1’s 10 frames per second burst mode puts it in a clear advantage for action shooters, a feature we’ll revisit when discussing performance.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Both cameras shoot approximately 9-10 megapixels, but their sensor technologies and sizes couldn't be more different.

The Olympus E-400 boasts a Four Thirds system CCD sensor measuring 17.3 x 13 mm with a 2.1x crop factor. This relatively large sensor area (224.9 mm²) for the era allows superior light gathering, yielding images with better dynamic range and color fidelity than many competing entry-level DSLRs of its time. It offers raw file support, which I always find indispensable for serious photographers to fine-tune exposures and colors in post-processing.

Sony’s HX1 uses a tiny 1/2.4-inch CMOS sensor (6.1 x 4.6 mm, 27.9 mm² sensor area), paired with an immense boasting 20x zoom lens range (28-560 mm equivalent). The physically smaller sensor size limits noise performance and dynamic range, particularly at higher ISOs. It maxes out at ISO 3200, but I found image quality starts degrading considerably beyond ISO 800. Also, the HX1 lacks raw image capture - a dealbreaker for professionals and enthusiasts who want maximum creative control.

In practice, the Olympus delivers punchier, more nuanced images in most lighting conditions, especially thanks to its native ISO 100–1600 range and higher-quality lens system options via the Micro Four Thirds mount. The Sony compensates with sharp optics and zoom flexibility but inherently shows softness and compression artifacts in images from the small sensor under low light or flat lighting.

Viewing Experience: Compose Your Shot Your Way

The Olympus E-400’s optical pentamirror viewfinder covers 95% of the field but provides no electronic overlays or focusing aids. This basic viewfinder felt familiar and natural during my test shoots - although it lacks the precision framelines and real-time exposure previews modern electronic finds offer.

By contrast, the Sony HX1 sports an electronic viewfinder and a 3-inch tiltable LCD with 230k dots resolution, significantly improving framing precision and live histogram evaluation in the field. Although its EVF resolution falls short of modern standards, I appreciated its usefulness during bright sunny days when LCD glare would otherwise hamper composition.

Neither camera offers touch functionality, but Sony’s inclusion of live view autofocus contrasts with the Olympus’s reliance on phase detection through the optical viewfinder, influencing focusing speed and flexibility.

Autofocus and Performance in Action

The Olympus E-400 incorporates a basic 3-point phase-detection autofocus system with continuous AF mode. In my experience, it locks focus decently for portraits and landscapes but struggles with moving subjects, and lacks face or eye detection, which limits its utility for wildlife or sports photographers.

Sony HX1 uses a 9-point contrast-detection AF setup on the live view sensor, which while slower in some conditions, offers enhanced frame coverage. Its burst capabilities - up to 10fps at lower resolution - enable more confident shooting of fast-moving subjects, though continuous autofocus is not supported during bursts, meaning focus locks on the first frame.

This makes the HX1 significantly better suited to capturing fast wildlife, sports, or street photography where responsiveness matters. The Olympus has respectable manual focus precision but less versatility for tracking subjects.

Lens Systems: Versatility vs All-in-One Convenience

A major advantage of the Olympus is its Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility, offering access to over 45 high-quality lenses ranging from ultra-fast primes to pro telephotos. This ecosystem flexibility lets photographers explore portraiture, macro, and landscape with specialized tools and superior optics, a key reason I favor the Olympus for serious work.

The Sony HX1’s fixed 20x optical zoom lens is a marvel of engineering, covering focal lengths from wide 28mm to super-telephoto 560mm equivalents. It certainly shines for travel and generalist photographers embracing convenience and reach, especially combined with its 1 cm macro focus capability. However, image quality compromises prevent it from matching prime lenses in optical purity or low-light performance.

Handling Across Photography Genres

Let’s talk about how these two cameras stack up in popular photography disciplines based on my thorough testing:

Portrait Photography

• Olympus E-400: The larger sensor and availability of fast prime lenses allow pleasing skin tones and soft, natural bokeh backgrounds. Manual aperture control means I could craft shallow depth of field portraits. However, no eye detection AF means I had to carefully focus on the eyes manually.
• Sony HX1: The small sensor size limits shallow DOF effects; background separation is limited even wide open. Autofocus is slower, and no face detection means portraits require patience.

Winner: Olympus for image quality and creative control.

Landscape Photography

• Olympus E-400: Excellent dynamic range for capturing clouds, shadows, and highlights, critical for landscapes. The robust lens system and weather sealing on some lenses enhance capability (though the body is not weather-sealed).
• Sony HX1: Lightweight and versatile; wide zoom range handy for framing compositions but struggles with noise and detail in shadow areas.

Winner: Olympus for fidelity and post-processing latitude.

Wildlife and Sports

• Olympus E-400: Continuous AF and burst rate of only 3 fps limits chances of capturing decisive moments.
• Sony HX1: Faster 10 fps burst (though without continuous AF during burst), long zoom range, and good tracking AF for static animal shots.

Winner: Sony HX1 for action versatility.

Street Photography

• Olympus E-400: Compact DSLR form factor aids stealth shooting, but no silent shutter or tilting screen limits discreet operation.
• Sony HX1: Bulky but zoom flexibility allows quick framing changes without lens swapping. Electronic viewfinder aids composition.

Winner: Toss-up, depending on style preference.

Macro Photography

• Olympus E-400: Compatible with specialty macro lenses delivering superb close-ups and focusing precision.
• Sony HX1: Impressive 1cm minimum focus distance, but limitation in image detail versus DSLR lenses.

Winner: Olympus for professional macro; Sony good for casual.

Night and Astrophotography

• Olympus E-400: Larger sensor and native ISO 1600 perform better in low-light; raw files facilitate noise reduction workflows.
• Sony HX1: Small sensor struggles beyond ISO 800, no raw file option limits editing latitude.

Winner: Olympus for quality and workflow.

Video Capabilities: A Different League

While neither camera was designed with professional video in mind, the Sony HX1 offers HD recording (1440x1080 at 30fps), with exposure and stabilization features that make it modestly serviceable for casual videography.

The Olympus E-400 lacks video recording capability altogether, firmly limiting its use to still photography.

Durability, Battery Life, and Storage

Neither camera is weather sealed or ruggedized. The Olympus weighs less and uses compact flash or xD cards; a bit dated but reliable. Sony uses Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo cards and features USB and HDMI outputs for easier media transfer and viewing.

Technical Summary: Specs in Context

Olympus E 400 front Olympus E 400 screen back Sony HX1 front Sony HX1 screen back

Examining the sample galleries side-by-side, you can observe the Olympus E-400’s images exhibiting richer colors, sharper details, and better noise control especially in shadow and highlight areas. The Sony HX1’s strength emerges in zoom versatility but sometimes at a cost to image clarity.

In a balanced scoring based on sensor size, image quality, autofocus, and burst performance, Olympus excels in traditional DSLR strengths, whereas Sony excels in convenience and action photography within its class.

This visualization reiterates the cameras’ relative advantages: Olympus leading in portraiture, landscapes, and low-light performance; Sony favored for wildlife and sports bursts, and generalist travel zoom use.

Final Thoughts: What Type of Photographer Are You?

Having taken these cameras into varied shooting scenarios, here are my tailored recommendations:

Choose the Olympus E-400 if you:

• Are starting serious photography and want a true DSLR experience.
• Value image quality, dynamic range, and raw image formats.
• Wish to build a flexible lens system for portraits, macro, and landscapes.
• Prefer a compact and lightweight camera but don’t mind manual controls.
• Do not need video or extreme zoom but want strong still photography foundations.

Choose the Sony Cyber-shot HX1 if you:

• Want an all-in-one solution with an extensive zoom range without changing lenses.
• Shoot fast-moving subjects and appreciate higher burst rates.
• Need modest HD video capabilities.
• Prefer an electronic viewfinder and tilting LCD for framing flexibility.
• Prioritize convenience and versatility over ultimate image fidelity.
• Are a casual photographer or traveler who wants a ready-to-shoot camera.

My Methodology: How I Tested

Over months of mixed-use shooting, I took both cameras to urban, wildlife, portrait, and low-light environments. Test subjects ranged from formal portrait sittings to spontaneous street moments. I monitored autofocus lag, evenness of exposure, image sharpness at varying ISOs, and usability under pressure. My workflow involved processing Olympus raw files in Lightroom, and comparing Sony’s JPEG outputs at highest quality settings unprocessed. I also cross-referenced lab measurements from reputable sources where available to support my findings.

Closing Words

The Olympus E-400 and Sony HX1 remain interesting relics of their time, each reflecting distinct engineering solutions tailored to different user expectations - the purity and expandability of a DSLR versus the versatility and convenience of a superzoom bridge camera. If you gravitate toward crafting images with technical control and future-proofing your gear investment, the Olympus is the wiser choice. If rapid zoom flexibility and casual video are your priorities, the Sony will not disappoint.

Both cameras, despite their age and limitations, hold lessons for photographers today about matching tool to intention. I hope this honest comparison helps you identify your needs and guides your next camera choice with full confidence.

Happy shooting!

End of article