Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a69e/2a69eb509c2626442e0587ba9561afe68bcfb2d0" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-5R front Sony Alpha NEX-5R front"
89 Imaging
57 Features
76 Overall
64
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Launched August 2012
- Older Model is Sony NEX-5N
- New Model is Sony NEX-5T
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the NEX-5R (16MP) is relatively similar but the VR-330 (1/2.3") and NEX-5R (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The VR-330 was introduced 18 months earlier than the NEX-5R which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5R being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the VR-330 grades against the NEX-5R when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-330 and Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sony NEX-5R
VR-330 | NEX-5R |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Olympus VR-330
NEX-5R | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2012 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 18 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sony NEX-5R
VR-330 | NEX-5R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VR-330 enjoys outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony NEX-5R has specifications of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the VR-330 vs the NEX-5R.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1447e/1447e4020b08c832232fabddc362789491599fb1" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and NEX-5R is 94 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/062dc/062dc372bc48494e80a5ddaefb169f824290eafc" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading specifications. The graphic here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and NEX-5R.
To sum up, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The VR-330 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony NEX-5R will offer extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older VR-330 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ed5b/0ed5b0ed53edcc7a0d14fea508c5248bdedb153a" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R sensor size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc297/dc297d0b972d73b78a23337b2f09fa1e0ab5b0f9" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-330 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 910 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $220 | $750 |