Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX200V
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Revealed May 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony HX100V
- Replacement is Sony HX300
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-400 versus Sony HX200V, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and HX200V (18MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and HX200V (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-400 was launched 6 years earlier than the HX200V and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-400 scores vs the HX200V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony HX200V
| E-400 | HX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus E-400
| HX200V | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2012 |  | September 2006 | More recent by 68 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 215k | Clearer display (+707k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony HX200V
| E-400 | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 offers outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has dimensions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") having a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-400 versus Sony HX200V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-400 vs the HX200V.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and HX200V is 77 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and HX200V.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-400 due to its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Sony HX200V will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2012-05-11 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 215 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 583 grams (1.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 450 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $599 | $480 |
