Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX90V
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
91 Imaging
43 Features
63 Overall
51
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX90V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 245g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Released April 2015
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX90V Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX90V, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and HX90V (18MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and HX90V (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-400 was unveiled 9 years prior to the HX90V which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony HX90V being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-400 matches up vs the HX90V with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX90V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Sony HX90V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony HX90V
E-400 | HX90V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX90V over the Olympus E-400
HX90V | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2015 | September 2006 | Newer by 104 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 215k | Crisper display (+706k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony HX90V
E-400 | HX90V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX90V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 offers exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony HX90V has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX90V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 and the HX90V.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and HX90V is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX90V Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The picture here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and HX90V.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony HX90V will give more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX90V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX90V Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2015-04-14 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 215k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 638k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.5x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $599 | $440 |