Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony RX1

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 front
Portability
79
Imaging
70
Features
57
Overall
64

Olympus E-400 vs Sony RX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Successor is Olympus E-410
Sony RX1
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
  • 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
  • Revealed February 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Sony RX1 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-400 vs Sony RX1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and RX1 (Full frame) use totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-400 was brought out 7 years before the RX1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-400 scores versus the RX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony RX1

 E-400 RX1 

Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Olympus E-400

 RX1 E-400 
RevealedFebruary 2013September 2006More recent by 78 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1229k215kClearer display (+1014k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony RX1

 E-400 RX1 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus E-400 vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 has physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony RX1 has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") and a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).

See the Olympus E-400 vs Sony RX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-400 compared to the RX1.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony RX1 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and RX1 is 77 and 79 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony RX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and RX1.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-400 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Sony RX1 will provide extra detail having its extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony RX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony RX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography information
Sony RX1 Portrait photography information
46
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution low (10MP)
82
you can focus manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/4,000 seconds)
good resolution (24MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
supports face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography details
Sony RX1 Street photography details
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
66
sensor size is great (Full frame)
delivers RAW formats
above average high ISO (25,600)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competition (482 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX1 as a Sports photography camera
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
53
good resolution (24MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
supports tracking focus
fixed focal length (35mm)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
bad battery life (270 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography factors
Sony RX1 Travel photography factors
49
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
62
good resolution (24MP)
flash built-in
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
no Time Lapse recording
bad battery life (270 shots)
heavier than competition (482g)
does not have a selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography information
Sony RX1 Landscape photography information
45
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
does not have Time Lapse function
65
you can focus manually
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
good resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
does not have image stabilization
bad battery life (270 CIPA)
no Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging details
Sony RX1 Vlogging details
9
can't shoot video
34
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
supports face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have mic socket
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competition (482g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-400 vs Sony RX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony RX1
 Olympus E-400Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-400 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1
Class Entry-Level DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Released 2006-09-14 2013-02-19
Physical type Compact SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 35.8 x 23.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 852.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35mm (1x)
Highest aperture - f/2.0-22.0
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 215k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - Xtra FineTFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic and Optical (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 6.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435g (0.96 lbs) 482g (1.06 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 93
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 25.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 14.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 2534
Other
Battery life - 270 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $599 $2,798