Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38


93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-400 and Sony S2000, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and S2000 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.

The E-400 was brought out 4 years prior to the S2000 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-400 scores vs the S2000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony S2000
E-400 | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus E-400
S2000 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | ![]() | September 2006 | Newer by 40 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony S2000
E-400 | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has proportions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-400 and Sony S2000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-400 vs the S2000.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and S2000 is 77 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through specs. The pic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and S2000.
All in all, both cameras provide the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-400 uses the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult. The more aged E-400 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $599 | $225 |