Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Successor is Olympus E-410
Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Introduced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-400 and Sony S2000, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and S2000 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-400 was brought out 4 years prior to the S2000 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-400 scores vs the S2000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony S2000

 E-400 S2000 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus E-400

 S2000 E-400 
IntroducedJanuary 2010September 2006Newer by 40 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution230k215kSharper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony S2000

 E-400 S2000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has proportions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-400 and Sony S2000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-400 vs the S2000.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and S2000 is 77 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through specs. The pic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and S2000.

All in all, both cameras provide the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-400 uses the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult. The more aged E-400 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography factors
Sony S2000 Portrait photography factors
45
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
manual mode not available
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
19
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Street photography camera
Sony S2000 as a Street photography camera
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
46
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography advice
Sony S2000 Sports photography advice
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,200s)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography details
Sony S2000 Travel photography details
49
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low megapixels (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
50
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography information
Sony S2000 Landscape photography information
44
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no liveview
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
27
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging info
Sony S2000 Vlogging info
9
no video recording
21
wide angle not great (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony S2000
 Olympus E-400Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-400 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2006-09-14 2010-01-07
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3456 x 2592
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 33-105mm (3.2x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.1-5.6
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 215 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1200 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.30 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lb) 167 grams (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $599 $225