Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2100
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
93 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Renewed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2100 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2100, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the S2100 (12MP) is very close but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and S2100 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-400 was revealed 4 years before the S2100 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony S2100 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-400 matches up vs the S2100 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Sony S2100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony S2100
| E-400 | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony S2100 over the Olympus E-400
| S2100 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | September 2006 | Newer by 40 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony S2100
| E-400 | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2100 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony S2100 has sizing of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 versus the S2100.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and S2100 is 77 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2100 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The picture underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and S2100.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony S2100 will result in greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2100 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-400 vs Sony S2100 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435g (0.96 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $599 | $0 |