Olympus E-400 vs Sony T110
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Olympus E-400 vs Sony T110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- New Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-108mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-400 vs Sony T110 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-400 vs Sony T110, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and T110 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and T110 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-400 was revealed 5 years earlier than the T110 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony T110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-400 matches up vs the T110 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-400 vs Sony T110 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Sony T110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony T110
| E-400 | T110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony T110 over the Olympus E-400
| T110 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | September 2006 | Fresher by 52 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony T110
| E-400 | T110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony T110 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony T110 has dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-400 vs Sony T110 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 compared to the T110.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and T110 is 77 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony T110 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The graphic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and T110.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-400 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony T110 will show extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony T110 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-400 vs Sony T110 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | Clear Photo LCD Plus with touchscreen interface |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 2.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $599 | $199 |