Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Refreshed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched February 2009
Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-400 and Sony T900, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-400 was brought out 3 years earlier than the T900 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-400 matches up against the T900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony T900
E-400 | T900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-400
T900 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2009 | September 2006 | More modern by 29 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 215k | Clearer screen (+707k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony T900
E-400 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 provides outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 and Sony T900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-400 compared to the T900.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and T900 is 77 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The pic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and T900.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-400 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Sony T900 will offer extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3.5" |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 143 grams (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $599 | $300 |