Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-410
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Launched February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-400 and Sony T900, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-400 was brought out 3 years earlier than the T900 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-400 matches up against the T900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony T900

 E-400 T900 

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-400

 T900 E-400 
LaunchedFebruary 2009September 2006More modern by 29 months
Screen dimensions3.5"2.5"Bigger screen (+1")
Screen resolution922k215kClearer screen (+707k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony T900

 E-400 T900 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 provides outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-400 and Sony T900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-400 compared to the T900.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and T900 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The pic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and T900.

Plainly, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-400 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Sony T900 will offer extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography advice
Sony T900 Portrait photography advice
45
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
no manual exposure
low MP (10MP)
27
manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography info
Sony T900 Street photography info
60
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
57
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-400
Sports photography with Sony T900
38
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
24
image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography highlights
Sony T900 Travel photography highlights
49
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
51
has built in flash
no Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography factors
Sony T900 Landscape photography factors
44
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
doesn't have Timelapse function
36
manual focus
very good size screen (3.5 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging information
Sony T900 Vlogging information
9
can't shoot video
28
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-400 vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony T900
 Olympus E-400Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-400 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Class Entry-Level DSLR Ultracompact
Launched 2006-09-14 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-10.0
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 3.5"
Display resolution 215k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 2s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lb) 143 grams (0.32 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $599 $300