Olympus E-400 vs Sony TF1
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
94 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.6-4.7) lens
- 152g - 102 x 62 x 23mm
- Announced June 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus E-400 vs Sony TF1 Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-400 and Sony TF1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and TF1 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TF1 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-400 was brought out 7 years earlier than the TF1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony TF1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-400 scores vs the TF1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-400 vs Sony TF1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Sony TF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony TF1
| E-400 | TF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TF1 over the Olympus E-400
| TF1 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2013 | September 2006 | Fresher by 82 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Clearer screen (+245k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony TF1
| E-400 | TF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TF1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 provides exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony TF1 has proportions of 102mm x 62mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 and Sony TF1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-400 against the TF1.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and TF1 is 77 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TF1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by reviewing specifications. The photograph here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and TF1.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony TF1 will deliver greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TF1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TF1 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2013-06-21 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.6-4.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 215k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 152 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 102 x 62 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $599 | $266 |