Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX200V
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced January 2012
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX200V Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-400 and Sony TX200V, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TX200V (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-400 was unveiled 6 years earlier than the TX200V which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-400 grades versus the TX200V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony TX200V
E-400 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus E-400
TX200V | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | September 2006 | More modern by 65 months | |
Display dimensions | 3.3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 215k | Crisper display (+1015k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony TX200V
E-400 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has sizing of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-400 and Sony TX200V in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-400 and the TX200V.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and TX200V is 77 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The picture underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and TX200V.
Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-400 with its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Sony TX200V will offer you extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2012-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lbs) | 129 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $599 | $500 |