Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX9
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38


95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Renewed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Announced July 2010

Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX9 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-400 versus Sony TX9, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the TX9 (12MP) is very close but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TX9 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.

The E-400 was launched 4 years prior to the TX9 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-400 matches up against the TX9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX9 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony TX9
E-400 | TX9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Olympus E-400
TX9 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 46 months |
Display size | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+707k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony TX9
E-400 | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 comes with exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony TX9 has sizing of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-400 versus Sony TX9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-400 vs the TX9.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and TX9 is 77 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and TX9.
As you can see, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-400 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony TX9 will render more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony TX9 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2010-07-08 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3.5" |
Resolution of display | 215 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lbs) | 149 gr (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $599 | $799 |