Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 front
Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2006
  • Updated by Olympus E-410
Sony W330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 128g - 96 x 57 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Overview

The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-400 and Sony W330, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and W330 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and W330 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-400 was launched 4 years before the W330 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W330 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-400 scores vs the W330 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony W330

 E-400 W330 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Sony W330 over the Olympus E-400

 W330 E-400 
LaunchedJanuary 2010September 2006Newer by 40 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k215kClearer display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony W330

 E-400 W330 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony W330 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-400 and Sony W330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-400 vs the W330.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and W330 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The pic below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and W330.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony W330 will render more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography details
Sony W330 Portrait photography details
45
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography info
Sony W330 Street photography info
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
48
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography info
Sony W330 Sports photography info
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
26
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
slow fps (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography highlights
Sony W330 Travel photography highlights
49
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
65
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.7)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography highlights
Sony W330 Landscape photography highlights
44
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse recording
37
really wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.7)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Sony W330 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
26
really wide (26mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony W330
 Olympus E-400Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-400 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330
Type Entry-Level DSLR Ultracompact
Announced 2006-09-14 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance - 4cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 640x480
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435g (0.96 lbs) 128g (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 96 x 57 x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $599 $170