Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
96 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 128g - 96 x 57 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-400 and Sony W330, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and W330 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and W330 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-400 was launched 4 years before the W330 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W330 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-400 scores vs the W330 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Sony W330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony W330
| E-400 | W330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony W330 over the Olympus E-400
| W330 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 | September 2006 | Newer by 40 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony W330
| E-400 | W330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony W330 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-400 and Sony W330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-400 vs the W330.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and W330 is 77 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The pic below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and W330.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony W330 will render more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W330 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 4cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435g (0.96 lbs) | 128g (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 57 x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $599 | $170 |