Olympus E-400 vs Sony W380
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
Photography Glossary Olympus E-400 vs Sony W380 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-400 and Sony W380, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and W380 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and W380 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-400 was introduced 4 years earlier than the W380 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W380 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-400 scores against the W380 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-400 vs Sony W380 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Sony W380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony W380
| E-400 | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony W380 over the Olympus E-400
| W380 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 | September 2006 | More modern by 40 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony W380
| E-400 | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W380 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 provides outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony W380 has proportions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-400 and Sony W380 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-400 and the W380.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and W380 is 77 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W380 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and W380.
As you can see, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Sony W380 will offer you greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W380 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-400 vs Sony W380 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.4-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435g (0.96 pounds) | 117g (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $599 | $44 |