Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W620

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W620 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Sony W620
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
  • 116g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
  • Released January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W620 Overview

The following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-400 vs Sony W620, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and W620 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and W620 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-400 was unveiled 6 years before the W620 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W620 being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-400 scores vs the W620 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony W620

 E-400 W620 
Manual focus Very precise focus

Reasons to pick Sony W620 over the Olympus E-400

 W620 E-400 
ReleasedJanuary 2012September 2006Newer by 64 months
Screen dimension2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony W620

 E-400 W620 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W620 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 provides physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony W620 has sizing of 98mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-400 vs Sony W620 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-400 and the W620.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W620 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and W620 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W620 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W620 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The picture underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and W620.

Plainly, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Sony W620 will give you extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W620 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W620 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography details
Sony W620 Portrait photography details
45
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
no manual mode
resolution not great (10MP)
33
decent MP (14MP)
features face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography information
Sony W620 Street photography information
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
56
lighter than competition (116 grams)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W620 as a Sports photography camera
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
32
decent MP (14MP)
features tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography highlights
Sony W620 Travel photography highlights
49
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
68
lighter than competition (116g)
decent MP (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W620 as a Landscape photography camera
44
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
no manual mode
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
missing Time Lapse recording
33
pretty wide (28mm)
decent MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging advice
Sony W620 Vlogging advice
9
lack of video recording
30
pretty wide (28mm)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (116g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony W620
 Olympus E-400Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-400 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2006-09-14 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.2-6.5
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - Clear Photo TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 pounds) 116 grams (0.26 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Cost at release $599 $102