Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX220

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 front
Portability
96
Imaging
43
Features
41
Overall
42

Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2006
  • Later Model is Olympus E-410
Sony WX220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
  • Released February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX220 Overview

Here is a in depth review of the Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX220, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and WX220 (18MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and WX220 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-400 was released 8 years earlier than the WX220 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-400 grades versus the WX220 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony WX220

 E-400 WX220 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Olympus E-400

 WX220 E-400 
ReleasedFebruary 2014September 2006Fresher by 90 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kClearer display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony WX220

 E-400 WX220 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony WX220 has proportions of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX220 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-400 compared to the WX220.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX220 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and WX220 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX220 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and WX220.

As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-400 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony WX220 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX220 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography information
Sony WX220 Portrait photography information
46
manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
manual exposure not possible
MP count low (10 megapixels)
37
decent MP (18MP)
offers face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography details
Sony WX220 Street photography details
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
59
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography information
Sony WX220 Sports photography information
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
46
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18MP)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography features
Sony WX220 Travel photography features
49
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
69
decent MP (18 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
long zoom (250mm)
does not have Timelapse function
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography info
Sony WX220 Landscape photography info
45
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no liveview
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
missing Timelapse recording
44
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging features
Sony WX220 Vlogging features
9
no video
34
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Sony WX220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony WX220
 Olympus E-400Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-400 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
Category Entry-Level DSLR Ultracompact
Announced 2006-09-14 2014-02-12
Body design Compact SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-250mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.70 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 grams (0.96 pounds) 121 grams (0.27 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 210 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $599 $198