Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony SLT-A35 front
Portability
69
Imaging
56
Features
70
Overall
61

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2006
  • Updated by Olympus E-410
Sony A35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 415g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Succeeded the Sony A33
  • Renewed by Sony A37
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Overview

Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-400 versus Sony A35, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and A35 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and A35 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-400 was revealed 6 years prior to the A35 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact SLR).

Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-400 scores versus the A35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony A35

 E-400 A35 

Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus E-400

 A35 E-400 
LaunchedSeptember 2011September 2006More recent by 61 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution921k215kCrisper display (+706k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony A35

 E-400 A35 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony A35 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-400 versus Sony A35 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-400 vs the A35.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and A35 is 77 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements just by reading specs. The graphic here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and A35.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-400 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A35 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography info
Sony A35 Portrait photography info
45
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not available
MP count low (10 megapixels)
73
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography highlights
Sony A35 Street photography highlights
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
71
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition (415g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography factors
Sony A35 Sports photography factors
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (6.0 fps)
terrible battery pack (440 shots)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography advice
Sony A35 Travel photography advice
49
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
58
lighter than competition (415 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery pack (440 shots)
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Sony A35
44
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
missing Time Lapse mode
69
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
terrible battery pack (440 shots)
does not have Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging info
Sony A35 Vlogging info
9
can't record video
36
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has mic socket
lighter than competition (415g)
display is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony A35
 Olympus E-400Sony SLT-A35
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-400 Sony SLT-A35
Class Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2006-09-14 2011-09-20
Physical type Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 215k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 12.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lb) 415 grams (0.91 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 74
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.7
DXO Low light rating not tested 763
Other
Battery life - 440 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $599 $598