Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-400 versus Sony A35, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and A35 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and A35 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-400 was revealed 6 years prior to the A35 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-400 scores versus the A35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Sony SLT-A35. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony A35
E-400 | A35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus E-400
A35 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2011 | September 2006 | More recent by 61 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 215k | Crisper display (+706k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony A35
E-400 | A35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony A35 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 versus Sony A35 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-400 vs the A35.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and A35 is 77 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements just by reading specs. The graphic here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and A35.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-400 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A35 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A35 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony SLT-A35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Sony SLT-A35 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2011-09-20 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 45 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 415 grams (0.91 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 763 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $599 | $598 |