Olympus E-400 vs Sony A37
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
67 Imaging
57 Features
65 Overall
60
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A37 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.6" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 506g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Announced May 2012
- Older Model is Sony A35
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-400 vs Sony A37 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-400 and Sony A37, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and A37 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and A37 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-400 was introduced 6 years before the A37 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-400 grades versus the A37 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-400 vs Sony A37 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 & Sony SLT-A37. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Sony A37 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony A37
| E-400 | A37 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A37 over the Olympus E-400
| A37 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | September 2006 | Fresher by 69 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 2.6" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.1") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony A37
| E-400 | A37 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A37 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony A37 has sizing of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 506 grams (1.12 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-400 and Sony A37 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-400 vs the A37.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and A37 is 77 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A37 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The photograph here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and A37.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-400 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A37 will offer more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A37 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A37 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Sony SLT-A37 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Sony SLT-A37 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2012-05-16 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.6 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 506 gr (1.12 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 75 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.9 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 799 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $599 | $522 |