Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A57

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony SLT-A57 front
Portability
64
Imaging
57
Features
85
Overall
68

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A57 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • New Model is Olympus E-410
Sony A57
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000 (Raise to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 618g - 132 x 98 x 81mm
  • Released September 2012
  • Old Model is Sony A55
  • Replacement is Sony A58
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A57 Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-400 and Sony A57, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and A57 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and A57 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-400 was released 7 years prior to the A57 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact SLR).

Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-400 grades versus the A57 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony A57

 E-400 A57 

Reasons to pick Sony A57 over the Olympus E-400

 A57 E-400 
ReleasedSeptember 2012September 2006More modern by 73 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution921k215kClearer display (+706k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony A57

 E-400 A57 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A57 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 has got external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony A57 has measurements of 132mm x 98mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.2") with a weight of 618 grams (1.36 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-400 and Sony A57 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the E-400 vs the A57.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A57 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and A57 is 77 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A57 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A57 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through specifications. The pic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and A57.

To sum up, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-400 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Sony A57 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A57 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A57 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A57 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A57 as a Portrait photography camera
46
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview feature
no manual mode
low megapixels (10MP)
74
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detect focusing
saves RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-400
Street photography with Sony A57
60
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
75
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography info
Sony A57 Sports photography info
38
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview feature
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
78
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
supports phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-400
Travel photography with Sony A57
49
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
67
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
lack of Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Sony A57
45
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
no manual mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse function
72
has manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging advice
Sony A57 Vlogging advice
9
no video recording
77
selfie friendly display
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A57 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony A57
 Olympus E-400Sony SLT-A57
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-400 Sony SLT-A57
Class Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2006-09-14 2012-09-13
Physical type Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 1600 16000
Max boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - Xtra Fine TFT drive with TruBlack technology
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (@ ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lbs) 618 grams (1.36 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 132 x 98 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 75
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.0
DXO Low light score not tested 785
Other
Battery life - 550 pictures
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $599 $1,000