Olympus E-400 vs Sony A65
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- New Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2011
- New Model is Sony A68
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A65 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-400 vs Sony A65, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-400 was revealed 6 years before the A65 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-400 grades versus the A65 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A65 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Sony SLT-A65. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony A65
E-400 | A65 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-400
A65 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2011 | September 2006 | Newer by 62 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 215k | Clearer display (+706k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony A65
E-400 | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 offers physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony A65 has proportions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") along with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-400 vs Sony A65 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-400 and the A65.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and A65 is 77 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The image below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and A65.
To sum up, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony A65 will provide more detail because of its extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Sony A65 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Sony SLT-A65 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 622 gr (1.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 560 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $599 | $700 |