Olympus E-410 vs Olympus E-620
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus E-620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2007
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-410
- Superseded the Olympus E-400
- Later Model is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-410 vs Olympus E-620 Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus E-620, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras and both are designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the E-620 (12MP) is pretty similar and they use the same exact sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-410 was unveiled 3 years prior to the E-620 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-410 matches up against the E-620 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-410 vs Olympus E-620 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-410 and Olympus E-620. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-410 Gallery and Olympus E-620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus E-620
| E-410 | E-620 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus E-410
| E-620 | E-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2009 |  | June 2007 | More modern by 25 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus E-620
| E-410 | E-620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus E-620 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-410 has outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-620 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus E-620 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-410 compared to the E-620.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-410 and E-620 is 77 and 71 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus E-620 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The pic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-410 and E-620.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus E-620 to offer extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-410 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus E-620 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus E-620 Specifications
| Olympus E-410 | Olympus E-620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-410 | Olympus E-620 |
| Also referred to as | EVOLT E-410 | - |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2007-06-14 | 2009-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 7 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.48x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | None |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 500 gr (1.10 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 51 | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | 21.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | 10.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 494 | 536 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | - | $799 |