Clicky

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40
Olympus E-410 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed June 2007
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-410
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-400
  • Later Model is Olympus E-420
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Additionally referred to as mju 9000
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus 9000, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-410 was revealed 23 months before the 9000 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-410 grades against the 9000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus 9000

 E-410 9000 
Manual focus Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-410

 9000 E-410 
AnnouncedMay 2009June 2007More modern by 23 months
Screen sizing2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kSharper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus 9000

 E-410 9000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-410 enjoys physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus 9000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-410 and the 9000.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-410 and 9000 is 77 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-410 and 9000.

As you can see, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-410 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus 9000 will give you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged E-410 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-410 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Portrait photography camera
56
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
21
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-410 Street photography features
Olympus 9000 Street photography features
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than competitors (225 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-410 Sports photography factors
Olympus 9000 Sports photography factors
42
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
low fps (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-410 Travel photography highlights
Olympus 9000 Travel photography highlights
49
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
58
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (225g)
MP count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-410
Landscape photography with Olympus 9000
50
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
small screen (2.5 inch)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
32
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-410 Vlogging factors
Olympus 9000 Vlogging factors
9
lack of video recording
27
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic socket
heavier than competitors (225 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-410 and Olympus 9000
 Olympus E-410Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-410 Olympus Stylus 9000
Also called EVOLT E-410 mju 9000
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2007-06-14 2009-05-14
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 50
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-280mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lb) 225 grams (0.50 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 51 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.0 not tested
DXO Low light rating 494 not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at release - $300