Olympus E-410 vs Olympus Tough-3000
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2007
- Other Name is EVOLT E-410
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-400
- New Model is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-410 versus Olympus Tough-3000, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-410 was released 3 years before the Tough-3000 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-410 grades against the Tough-3000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-410 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-410 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-410 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-410
Tough-3000 | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | June 2007 | Newer by 31 months | |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-410 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-410 offers exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-410 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-410 versus the Tough-3000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-410 and Tough-3000 is 77 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The image underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-410 and Tough-3000.
Plainly, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus Tough-3000 will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged E-410 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-410 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Alternative name | EVOLT E-410 | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2007-06-14 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 159 gr (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 494 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | - | $0 |