Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2007
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-410
- Superseded the Olympus E-400
- Successor is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-850 iHS, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-410 was launched 7 years before the TG-850 iHS which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-410 grades versus the TG-850 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-410 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-410 Gallery and Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-410 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-410
TG-850 iHS | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | June 2007 | Newer by 80 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Crisper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-410 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-410 provides external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-850 iHS has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-850 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-410 versus the TG-850 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-410 and TG-850 iHS is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions merely by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-410 and TG-850 iHS.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-850 iHS will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-410 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-410 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-410 | - |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2007-06-14 | 2014-01-29 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4616 x 3464 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 494 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | - | $250 |