Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-860
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2007
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-410
- Succeeded the Olympus E-400
- Successor is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Successor is Olympus TG-870
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-860, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-410 was launched 8 years earlier than the TG-860 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-410 scores vs the TG-860 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-410 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-410 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus TG-860
E-410 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-410
TG-860 | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | June 2007 | More modern by 93 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Sharper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-860
E-410 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-410 has external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus TG-860 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-860 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-410 vs the TG-860.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-410 and TG-860 is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The pic here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-410 and TG-860.
All in all, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-410 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-860 will give greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-410 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-410 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Other name | EVOLT E-410 | - |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2007-06-14 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 215k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 224 gr (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 494 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | - | $279 |