Clicky

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-810

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40
Olympus E-410 front
 
Olympus TG-810 front
Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
37
Overall
37

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs

Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced June 2007
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-410
  • Old Model is Olympus E-400
  • Replacement is Olympus E-420
Olympus TG-810
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
  • Revealed August 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview

Following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-810, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and TG-810 (14MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and TG-810 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-410 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the TG-810 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-410 matches up vs the TG-810 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus TG-810

 E-410 TG-810 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Olympus E-410

 TG-810 E-410 
RevealedAugust 2011June 2007More modern by 50 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k215kClearer display (+705k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-810

 E-410 TG-810 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-410 has outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-810 has specifications of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-810 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-410 versus the TG-810.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-410 and TG-810 is 77 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-410 and TG-810.

Clearly, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-410 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-810 will give you more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-410 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-410 Portrait photography info
Olympus TG-810 Portrait photography info
56
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
supports face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-410
Street photography with Olympus TG-810
60
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-410
Sports photography with Olympus TG-810
42
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
max fps low (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
40
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
weather sealing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (220 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-410 Travel photography info
Olympus TG-810 Travel photography info
49
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
64
weather sealing
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
no Timelapse recording
not so great battery power (220 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-410
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-810
50
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inch)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse function
43
rather wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
not so great battery power (220 shots)
no Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-410 Vlogging info
Olympus TG-810 Vlogging info
9
can't shoot video
30
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-810
 Olympus E-410Olympus TG-810
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-410 Olympus TG-810
Also called EVOLT E-410 -
Type Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Introduced 2007-06-14 2011-08-16
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range - 3cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 215k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.20 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435g (0.96 lb) 215g (0.47 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 51 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.0 not tested
DXO Low light score 494 not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch - $428