Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2007
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-410
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-400
- Later Model is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-410 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is very similar but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-410 was introduced 5 years before the TG-820 iHS and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-410 grades vs the TG-820 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-410 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-410 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-410
TG-820 iHS | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | June 2007 | Fresher by 56 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1030k | 215k | Crisper display (+815k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-410 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-410 comes with external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-410 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-410 versus the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-410 and TG-820 iHS is 77 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-410 and TG-820 iHS.
Clearly, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-410 having a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will deliver more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older E-410 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-410 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Alternative name | EVOLT E-410 | - |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2007-06-14 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 1,030k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 494 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | - | $500 |