Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2007
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-410
- Previous Model is Olympus E-400
- Renewed by Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-410 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-410 was manufactured 6 years prior to the TG-830 iHS which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-410 matches up vs the TG-830 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-410 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-410 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-410 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-410
TG-830 iHS | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | June 2007 | Newer by 67 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 215k | Sharper display (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-410 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-410 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Olympus E-410 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-410 compared to the TG-830 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-410 and TG-830 iHS is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The pic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-410 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will offer you more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-410 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-410 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-410 | - |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2007-06-14 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 214 grams (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 494 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | - | $0 |