Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2007
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-410
- Old Model is Olympus E-400
- Later Model is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-410 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-410 was released 7 years prior to the TG-2 iHS which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-410 scores against the TG-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-410 and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-410 Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-410 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-410
TG-2 iHS | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2013 | June 2007 | Newer by 73 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 610k | 215k | Crisper display (+395k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-410 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-410 provides outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-410 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-410 and the TG-2 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-410 and TG-2 iHS is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking specs. The picture here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-410 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will give greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged E-410 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-410 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Also called as | EVOLT E-410 | - |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2007-06-14 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 494 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | - | $380 |