Clicky

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40
Olympus E-410 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
42
Overall
38

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed June 2007
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-410
  • Old Model is Olympus E-400
  • Later Model is Olympus E-420
Olympus TG-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
  • Announced June 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview

Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-410 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-410 was released 7 years prior to the TG-2 iHS which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-410 scores against the TG-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS

 E-410 TG-2 iHS 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-410

 TG-2 iHS E-410 
AnnouncedJune 2013June 2007Newer by 73 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution610k215kCrisper display (+395k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-2 iHS

 E-410 TG-2 iHS 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison

When you are looking to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-410 provides outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-410 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-410 and the TG-2 iHS.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-410 and TG-2 iHS is 77 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking specs. The picture here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-410 and TG-2 iHS.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will give greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged E-410 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-410
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-2 iHS
56
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
27
supports face detection focus
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-410 Street photography details
Olympus TG-2 iHS Street photography details
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-410 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
42
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
40
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proof
great battery power (350 per charge)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-410 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
49
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
does not feature selfie friendly display
68
great battery power (350 shots)
weather proof
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
does not have Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-410 Landscape photography advice
Olympus TG-2 iHS Landscape photography advice
50
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.5")
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
does not have Time Lapse recording
46
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
great battery power (350 shots)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-410 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-2 iHS Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
36
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
 Olympus E-410Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-410 Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS
Also called as EVOLT E-410 -
Category Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Revealed 2007-06-14 2013-06-28
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215k dot 610k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435g (0.96 lbs) 230g (0.51 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 51 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.0 not tested
DXO Low light score 494 not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model - Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card -
Storage slots One One
Price at launch - $380