Clicky

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-4

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40
Olympus E-410 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs

Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced June 2007
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-410
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-400
  • Renewed by Olympus E-420
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Revealed April 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus TG-3
  • Renewed by Olympus TG-5
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview

In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-4, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-410 was released 8 years earlier than the TG-4 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-410 matches up vs the TG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus TG-4

 E-410 TG-4 

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-410

 TG-4 E-410 
RevealedApril 2015June 2007Newer by 95 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kClearer display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-4

 E-410 TG-4 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-410 features physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-410 vs the TG-4.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-410 and TG-4 is 77 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing specs. The image below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-410 and TG-4.

All in all, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-4 will show more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-410 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-410 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography highlights
56
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
47
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-410 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Street photography camera
60
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than average (247g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-410 Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography highlights
42
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
low fps (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
48
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
features tracking focus
environment sealing
great battery power (380 shots)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-410 Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography factors
49
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse function
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
74
great battery power (380 CIPA)
environment sealing
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than average (247g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-410
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-4
50
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
does not have Timelapse function
62
you can focus manually
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
great battery power (380 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-410 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
34
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing microphone jack
more heavy than average (247g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-410 and Olympus TG-4
 Olympus E-410Olympus Tough TG-4
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-410 Olympus Tough TG-4
Also called as EVOLT E-410 -
Class Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Introduced 2007-06-14 2015-04-13
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 7.90 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 gr (0.96 pounds) 247 gr (0.54 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 51 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.0 not tested
DXO Low light score 494 not tested
Other
Battery life - 380 shots
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost - $379