Clicky

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40
Olympus E-410 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched June 2007
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-410
  • Older Model is Olympus E-400
  • Replacement is Olympus E-420
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced February 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-330, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and VR-330 (14MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The E-410 was unveiled 4 years before the VR-330 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-410 matches up versus the VR-330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus VR-330

 E-410 VR-330 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-410

 VR-330 E-410 
AnnouncedFebruary 2011June 2007Newer by 44 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kSharper display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus VR-330

 E-410 VR-330 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-410 offers exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-410 compared to the VR-330.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-410 and VR-330 is 77 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching specifications. The image underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-410 and VR-330.

To sum up, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus VR-330 will provide you with greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-410 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-410
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
56
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
low resolution (10 megapixels)
33
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
includes face detection focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-410 Street photography details
Olympus VR-330 Street photography details
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (158g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-410 Sports photography information
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography information
42
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
includes tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-410
Travel photography with Olympus VR-330
49
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
70
lighter than others in class (158g)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-410
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-330
50
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.5 inch)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
lack of Time Lapse mode
42
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-410 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video recording
32
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
lighter than others in class (158g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-410 and Olympus VR-330
 Olympus E-410Olympus VR-330
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-410 Olympus VR-330
Also Known as EVOLT E-410 -
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2007-06-14 2011-02-08
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 215 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 pounds) 158 grams (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 51 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.0 not tested
DXO Low light rating 494 not tested
Other
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost - $220