Clicky

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40
Olympus E-410 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced June 2007
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-410
  • Old Model is Olympus E-400
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-420
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Released December 2012
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

The following is a complete review of the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very comparable but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") come with different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-410 was revealed 6 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-410 grades against the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-410 XZ-2 iHS 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-410

 XZ-2 iHS E-410 
ReleasedDecember 2012June 2007Newer by 67 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k215kSharper display (+705k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-410 XZ-2 iHS 
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-410 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-410 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-410 and XZ-2 iHS is 77 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The pic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-410 and XZ-2 iHS.

All in all, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will provide extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-410 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-410
Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
56
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
low resolution (10 megapixels)
46
focusing manually
has face detection focus
saves RAW files
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-410 Street photography info
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography info
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
66
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
more heavy than competition (346 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-410 Sports photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography factors
42
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery (340 shots)
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-410 Travel photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography highlights
49
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
61
better than average battery (340 CIPA)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (346g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-410
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
50
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inch)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
55
focusing manually
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (340 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-410 Vlogging highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging highlights
9
can't shoot video
36
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has external microphone jack
display isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than competition (346g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-410 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus E-410Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-410 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Also called as EVOLT E-410 -
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2007-06-14 2012-12-18
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 35
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 215k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435g (0.96 lbs) 346g (0.76 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 51 49
DXO Color Depth score 21.1 20.4
DXO Dynamic range score 10.0 11.3
DXO Low light score 494 216
Other
Battery life - 340 pictures
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model - Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch - $450