Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS200
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2007
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-410
- Old Model is Olympus E-400
- New Model is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Released February 2018
- Alternative Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-410 versus Panasonic ZS200, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") provide different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-410 was introduced 11 years earlier than the ZS200 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-410 matches up against the ZS200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-410 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-410 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-410 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-410
ZS200 | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | June 2007 | Newer by 129 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 215k | Crisper display (+1025k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic ZS200
E-410 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-410 features outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-410 versus Panasonic ZS200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-410 and the ZS200.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-410 and ZS200 is 77 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The pic here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-410 and ZS200.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will provide you with more detail using its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-410 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-410 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2007-06-14 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 340 grams (0.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 494 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | - | $800 |