Clicky

Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40
Olympus E-410 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced June 2007
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-410
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-400
  • Renewed by Olympus E-420
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Released July 2012
  • Superseded the Panasonic FZ100
  • Later Model is Panasonic FZ300
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic FZ200, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-410 was launched 6 years prior to the FZ200 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the E-410 scores vs the FZ200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Panasonic FZ200

 E-410 FZ200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-410

 FZ200 E-410 
ReleasedJuly 2012June 2007More modern by 62 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kCrisper screen (+245k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic FZ200

 E-410 FZ200 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-410 has physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") along with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic FZ200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-410 and the FZ200.

Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-410 and FZ200 is 77 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The pic here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-410 and FZ200.

All in all, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-410 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ200 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-410 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-410 Portrait photography features
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography features
56
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
48
has manual focus
high flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
has face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-410 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Street photography camera
60
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
57
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (588 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-410 Sports photography info
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography info
42
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
46
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
great battery pack (540 shots)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-410 Travel photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography factors
49
built-in flash
no Time Lapse recording
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
55
great battery pack (540 per charge)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
reasonably wide (25mm)
long reach (600mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (588g)
low megapixels (12MP)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-410 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography factors
50
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
no Time Lapse recording
48
has manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
great battery pack (540 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-410 Vlogging factors
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
63
reasonably wide (25mm)
display is selfie friendly
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has microphone port
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
more heavy than competition (588 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-410 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus E-410Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-410 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Alternate name EVOLT E-410 -
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2007-06-14 2012-07-18
Body design Compact SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312k dot
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 13.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435g (0.96 lbs) 588g (1.30 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 51 37
DXO Color Depth rating 21.1 19.1
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.0 10.8
DXO Low light rating 494 114
Other
Battery life - 540 photos
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost - $499