Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2007
- Also Known as EVOLT E-410
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-400
- Renewed by Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Released July 2012
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ100
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ300
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic FZ200, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-410 was launched 6 years prior to the FZ200 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the E-410 scores vs the FZ200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-410 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-410 Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Panasonic FZ200
E-410 | FZ200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-410
FZ200 | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2012 | June 2007 | More modern by 62 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Crisper screen (+245k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic FZ200
E-410 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-410 has physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") along with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic FZ200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-410 and the FZ200.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-410 and FZ200 is 77 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The pic here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-410 and FZ200.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-410 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ200 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-410 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-410 | - |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2007-06-14 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lbs) | 588g (1.30 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 51 | 37 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 494 | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 540 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | - | $499 |