Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ2500
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2007
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-410
- Replaced the Olympus E-400
- Replacement is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Launched September 2016
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ2500, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") use totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-410 was revealed 10 years earlier than the FZ2500 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-410 grades versus the FZ2500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-410 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-410 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Panasonic FZ2500
E-410 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-410
FZ2500 | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | June 2007 | Newer by 112 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 215k | Clearer display (+825k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Panasonic FZ2500
E-410 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus |
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-410 features outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") accompanied by a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ2500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-410 versus the FZ2500.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-410 and FZ2500 is 77 and 53 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-410 and FZ2500.
As you can see, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will show extra detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-410 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-410 | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2007-06-14 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 915 grams (2.02 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 51 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.1 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 494 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | - | $998 |