Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX2
77 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2007
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-410
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-400
- Replacement is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-410 versus Ricoh CX2, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the CX2 (9MP) is relatively close but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and CX2 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-410 was introduced 3 years before the CX2 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-410 matches up versus the CX2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-410 & Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-410 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Ricoh CX2
| E-410 | CX2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus E-410
| CX2 | E-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2009 | June 2007 | Fresher by 26 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 215k | Sharper screen (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Ricoh CX2
| E-410 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-410 has exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Olympus E-410 versus Ricoh CX2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-410 versus the CX2.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-410 and CX2 is 77 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by researching specs. The visual underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-410 and CX2.
All in all, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-410 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-410 will render more detail using its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-410 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus E-410 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus E-410 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Other name | EVOLT E-410 | - |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2007-06-14 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 185 grams (0.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 51 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 494 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | - | $341 |