Clicky

Olympus E-410 vs Sony NEX-F3

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40
Olympus E-410 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
57
Features
60
Overall
58

Olympus E-410 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs

Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched June 2007
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-410
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-400
  • Updated by Olympus E-420
Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
  • Announced August 2012
  • Older Model is Sony NEX-C3
  • Newer Model is Sony NEX-3N
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-410 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-410 vs Sony NEX-F3, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and NEX-F3 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-410 was introduced 6 years prior to the NEX-F3 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-410 scores versus the NEX-F3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Sony NEX-F3

 E-410 NEX-F3 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus E-410

 NEX-F3 E-410 
AnnouncedAugust 2012June 2007Fresher by 63 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k215kSharper display (+705k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Sony NEX-F3

 E-410 NEX-F3 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Olympus E-410 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-410 has got external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-F3 has dimensions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-410 vs Sony NEX-F3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-410 vs the NEX-F3.

Olympus E-410 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-410 and NEX-F3 is 77 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-410 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-410 and NEX-F3.

As you can see, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-410 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Sony NEX-F3 will show extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older E-410 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-410 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-410 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-410 Portrait photography information
Sony NEX-F3 Portrait photography information
56
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
low MP (10 megapixels)
74
focusing manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-410 as a Street photography camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Street photography camera
60
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
76
screen tilts
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-410 as a Sports photography camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Sports photography camera
42
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
53
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
better than average battery life (470 per charge)
max fps very slow (6.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-410
Travel photography with Sony NEX-F3
49
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
low MP (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
69
better than average battery life (470 per charge)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-410
Landscape photography with Sony NEX-F3
50
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inches)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
does not have Time Lapse mode
70
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony E mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (470 CIPA)
lack of image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-410 as a Vlogging camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
27
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
missing mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-410 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-410 and Sony NEX-F3
 Olympus E-410Sony Alpha NEX-F3
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-410 Sony Alpha NEX-F3
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-410 -
Type Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2007-06-14 2012-08-16
Body design Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 1600 16000
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Available lenses 45 121
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 215 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 6.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lb) 314 gr (0.69 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 51 73
DXO Color Depth score 21.1 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score 10.0 12.3
DXO Low light score 494 1114
Other
Battery life - 470 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost - $470